Cardas Golden Cross Speaker
Plato’s Symposium was constrained to a series of encomion speeches, saying the praises of the nature of Eros, or, Love. The culmination of the first several speeches of great men was the reply of Diotima, a priestess whose views on the relationship between love, beauty and wisdom were expressed through the mouth of Socrates. Diotima's prescriptions foretold pathological psychoanalytic symptoms of illegality within organizations, especially what are now referred to as ‘agile organizations’, when their internal communications are unwisely constrained to that of encomion.
Future Love – Constraint to Projecting from the Parent Imago
Diotima told Socrates that judging things correctly without being able to give a reason is somewhere in-between understanding and ignorance. She also asked why all the speakers at the Symposium had agreed that Love was a great god, when they also said that Love is not a god at all. She deduced from this apparent paradox that Love is a great spirit in-between god and mortal, in character, whose function is as a messenger between gods and men. This is the intermediary Daimon (demon with today's perjorative meaning). However, each speaker was constrained into encomia, and that is why they all incorrectly characterized Love as a god. Constraint of communications creates paradox.
In mythical terms, Eros is neither god nor mortal, but rather, the intermediate Daimon infused with elements of both god and mortal. Rosen noted that Diotima began with Eros as a Daimon who inspired men to love the beautiful. After she had linked beauty with goodness, Eros was no longer a Daimon, but had its new source in the corporeal, as a fundamental aspect of genesis. Her view was that Eros acts as assistance in the attempt to grasp immortality, via the perception of beauty.
→ 0 Comments
Posted in card gold line phone
